Tuesday, May 27, 2014

RACE :: Inconsistencies (Obama, Elliot, Zimmerman)

Barack Hussein Obama.   Mom is white.  Dad is black.   The media calls him "black".   Generally speaking, if you are half white and half black you are called "black".  Barack is of an equal amount white as he is black.

Elliot Rodger.  Mom is of Chinese decent, from Malaysia.  Dad is white.  The media and blogosphere are ablaze with claims of "white privilege".   Elliot is an equal amount Chinese (via Malaysia) as he is white.

George Zimmerman.  Mom is Hispanic.  Dad is white.  The media constantly referred to him as "White".    This stoked the race card in the Treyvon Shooting incident.  George is of an equal amount Hispanic as he is white.

The media is at the top of the list of those hammering "racism" yet they are one of, if not THE top proponent of stoking "racism".

Don't fall into the "race" game.   


Participating Patsy

Participating Pat·sy- (Noun)
A willing actor who will go down as the sole fall-guy for an event that was actually perpetrated, orchestrated and executed by multiple parties.  

A patsy is a fall guy for an event.  An easy set-up.

A "participating patsy" is a more evolved attack.   Instead of just a set-up, the real attackers actually encourage and utilize a willing and often psychologically unstable "participating patsy".   One of the hallmarks of the PP is that the fall-guy is almost always mentally unstable in the eyes of the jury (you the viewing public).

The PP won't deny that they are the source, brains, and that they acted alone.   They think all along that they are going to pull off the attack.   They are lured by the power, the ego, and whatever "cause" or "agenda" that they are indoctrinated with.  The PP will often take credit for the attack (prior to the attack via video, letters.... or after being captured in the rare event that they weren't murdered by the real attackers) yet all along the attack's success,  execution, scope, breadth, and effectiveness was entirely due to the real attackers.    They don't have to take credit to be the PP ---  if the case is strong against them and they are dead, their mental instability or some back-story can suffice to pitch them as the fall-guy.   The PP is a pawn to serve as the fall-guy --- undeniably so since they were apart of the attack all along the way.

You can sniff out the PP attack.    When the next "event" strikes your local news, PAY ATTENTION.   If the initial unfiltered reports and real eye-witnesses acknowledge multiple attackers ....  the event is ripe for a PP.   If shortly thereafter the "official narrative" emerges and eliminates mentions of the "other" attackers....  the media stations have likely been hand-fed the script via their superiors.   The story will read that there was one attacker, not two, or three.   All highlighted evidence from this point forward will overwhelmingly show that the lone attacker (or attacker party) was solely responsible for the carnage.

Consider this pattern for the following events:

::17 known terrorist attacks ultimately orchestrated by FBI agents but carried out by misguided men that became "terrorists" via the FBI encouragement, resources, and help.
::Sandy Hook  (originally multiple shooters reported by multiple sources)
::DC car / barrier event (passenger seen ducking in the video of the fleeing car)
::Retribution Killer  (originally reported that the passenger was the shooter, confirms the eye-witness accounts)
::Navy Yard Shooting

A likely scenario along with these "killings" is that the PP is off'd by the "other" shooter (at the scene).   Other-times don't even require the PP present.   They could screw up the operation.   There are various derivations on this theme --- they all work if the heat all points to the PP.   Training videos (on-site) can be used and released as live-event videos to convince the public of the "actual event" even though it didn't go down exactly that way.

Why orchestrate chaos, murder and mayhem and have a fall-guy?   Either the chaos, murder and mayhem is the goal (not likely) or the chaos, murder and mayhem enables reactions/responses that are the goal (much more likely).

These events and ops take planning.

It is important to note that none of these attacks actually have to take place in the real world.  They can be complete fictions invented and sold to the masses as being "real".    The narrative and the fallout from the narrative is what is important.   Whether or not this event or that event actually happened (real people died the way the news claims) is irrelevant with respect to what happens NEXT.   The agenda is always the end-game.   The "response" (or solution purposed and enacted upon us) .... the "reaction" to the "catastrophe".....  is almost always the "reason" behind the "event".

You've been warned.

A look at a "possible" future:

Que up the SCI-FI script:

Technology increase is rapidly accelerating and reaching a pace we've never seen.  It's hard to grasp how fast things are moving.   It is even harder for humans to imagine a word where Artificial Intelligence surpasses that of human intelligence.  How can you grasp something that is smarter than you?  How can an ant fathom the mind of Einstein?   We are on an unstoppable path whereby jobs are minimized and more of the populace becomes unemployed and essentially irrelevant in the eyes of the state.

As time proceeds more jobs will be automated via new technology advancements.   This will increase unemployment because less and less jobs will be available for humans to fill.    Social programs will be increasingly put under more and more stress each year.   New jobs and skills will pop-up but they will not keep up with those jobs that are lost due to automation and future technologies increasing at exponential rates.   The "Minimum Wage" line will move forward into the jobs that currently are considered "skilled" jobs.    Why hire a designer when you can employ a program that does a better job in a fraction of the time?   Name the job --- it can likely be automated by future technology.   The accelerated pace of technology growth will rapidly push the MW line deeper right.  MW is always paid for the jobs that require the least skill but cannot yet be automated.   MW jobs are always those jobs that are close to being automated and done away with.   As more jobs are automated the MW pool will increase by pulling MW+ jobs into MW jobs.  There will be less and less jobs left to fill by skilled humans.  Many MW+ "skills" in today's world will be considered non-skills in the near future.  

3D printing, autonomous drones, builder-bots, automated tellers, AI personalities, AI experts and AI advisers ----  all are just a sub-set of technologies that are increasingly cutting away from available jobs. 

Possible Future Scenario:
The majority of America (and humanity) is headed towards a complete welfare state.   Eventually there will be a point where the majority of humanity is sustained by the graces of the "state's" welfare programs.   Population will have to be minimized.  There are no MW jobs in this future.  There will be only a few very powerful jobs for humans.  The bulk of humanity will be tightly controlled, clothed, housed, fed, and entertained by the state because there is otherwise nothing else for them to do.    If you do not subscribe to this future-state program you will have no other way to sustain yourself and your family.    

Less than 1% of 1% will hold the power and be considered "the elite" or the "royalty" in this future.  Less than 1% of humanity will be "needed" for the skills they provide the planet.  They will be respected by the elite....  the rest of humanity will be the "lowers" --- the lessor species that are kept around only because the powerful elite allow them to live.