tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21338718607791687122024-02-07T03:13:31.969-08:00HeadsUpAlertsThe Writing Is On The Wall, just read it.
All information is publicly available. No secret sources are needed.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-36604213165164842602014-06-26T09:54:00.003-07:002014-06-26T09:58:23.195-07:00WESTERN MEDIA DICTIONARY<br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Recent Entries:</span></b><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.henrylim.org/Dictionary.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.henrylim.org/Dictionary.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></a></div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></b>
<b><br /></b>
<b>MISC ENTRIES: </b><br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Homophobic: </b>Anyone who doesn't agree with or support EVERYTHING surrounding, related to, or connected with anything or anyone homosexual, Additionally, anyone who uses any language deemed "offensive" (subjective) pertaining to the aforementioned.<br />
<br />
Examples: <br />
<br />
<ul>
<li>If you don't hire someone, and they are gay, you are homophobic.</li>
<li>If you say something that offends someone gay, you are a homophobic.</li>
<li>If a gay man doesn't succeed it is because of homophobia. </li>
<li>If you are an actor and don't accept a gay role, you are homophobic.</li>
<li>If you are a 3rd grade teacher and don't want to teach your students about homosexuality, you are a homophobic.</li>
<li>If you don't believe that the Institution of Marriage should include homosexuals, you are a homophobic.</li>
<li>If you feel uncomfortable with a gay man babysitting your 8 year old son, you are a homophobic (never-mind that it is was a concern over possible pedophilia that gave you pause. When you didn't hire a man babysitter for your 12 year old daughter no one questioned it)</li>
</ul>
<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Conspiracy Theorist: </b>Anyone who doesn't believe the propaganda, lies, and deceit that someone in a position of authority (govt, news etc) tries to sell them.<br />
<br />
<b>Immigration Reform:</b> Paying guides and coyotes to bring illegal alien minors into the USA (and aiding them in safe passage) in order to cause a devastating and disastrous domestic situation in southern states that will require immediate action.<br />
<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>FOREIGN ENTRIES:</b><br />
<b> </b><br />
<b>Ukranian Rebels:</b> Ukrainians who don't support the new Western regime put in place by an illegal coup and takeover of their country.<br />
<br />
<b>Ukranian Defense: </b> Illegal Ukrainians who ousted the legal govt. with the help of NATO and the US.<br />
<br />
<b>Syrian Jihadists:</b> Legal govt and citizens of Syria fighting against foreign invaders.<br />
<br />
<b>Syrian Freedom Fighters: </b> US trained, funded non-Syrian rebels that fight against Syria.<br />
<br />
<b>on ISIS attacking Iraq:</b> Oops, we funded and trained them to attack Assad.<br />
<br />
<b>on ISIS finding Saddam's Chemical Weapons Stash: </b> WOW --- they did what UN inspectors and the USA couldn't do for 10 years? Someone finally found the missing WMDs?<br />
<br />
Where will the <strike>USA</strike> I mean ISIS attack with these chemical weapons? That will be the new PROBLEM. What will be the public REACTION (after spun by the media and various govts)? Finally, what will the response (SOLUTION) be to it the drummed up REACTION?<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">You've been warned.</span></b>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-28740550388432662102014-05-27T14:23:00.001-07:002014-05-27T14:23:36.555-07:00RACE :: Inconsistencies (Obama, Elliot, Zimmerman)<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-a8VEK08OMHs/U4UBUWFwVMI/AAAAAAAAAF0/IREyITeb6Q4/s1600/3triplet2.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-a8VEK08OMHs/U4UBUWFwVMI/AAAAAAAAAF0/IREyITeb6Q4/s1600/3triplet2.png" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Barack Hussein Obama.</b> Mom is white. Dad is black. The media calls him "black". Generally speaking, if you are half white and half black you are called "black". Barack is of an equal amount white as he is black.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-XdfjZw1LsZ4/U4UBaqgCgEI/AAAAAAAAAF8/AHvTnXh_C4E/s1600/baracksParents.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-XdfjZw1LsZ4/U4UBaqgCgEI/AAAAAAAAAF8/AHvTnXh_C4E/s1600/baracksParents.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Elliot Rodger. </b> Mom is of Chinese decent, from Malaysia. Dad is white. The media and blogosphere are ablaze with claims of "white privilege". Elliot is an equal amount Chinese (via Malaysia) as he is white.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Eh1a1NpEhx8/U4UBkdxC11I/AAAAAAAAAGM/vFpWI_7TlZs/s1600/elliot-rodger-mother-lichin-rodger-pic.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Eh1a1NpEhx8/U4UBkdxC11I/AAAAAAAAAGM/vFpWI_7TlZs/s1600/elliot-rodger-mother-lichin-rodger-pic.jpg" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<b>George Zimmerman.</b> Mom is Hispanic. Dad is white. The media constantly referred to him as "White". This stoked the race card in the Treyvon Shooting incident. George is of an equal amount Hispanic as he is white.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YoWMStm77xA/U4UBfAqddHI/AAAAAAAAAGE/YyqA8tpNfEk/s1600/zimmerman_parents.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YoWMStm77xA/U4UBfAqddHI/AAAAAAAAAGE/YyqA8tpNfEk/s1600/zimmerman_parents.jpg" height="180" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The media is at the top of the list of those hammering "racism" yet they are one of, if not THE top proponent of stoking "racism".</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Don't fall into the "race" game. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<b><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">YOU'VE BEEN WARNED</span></b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-9806417168361412712014-05-27T12:39:00.000-07:002014-05-27T12:42:43.657-07:00Participating Patsy<b><span style="font-size: large;">Participating Pat·sy- (Noun)</span></b><br />
<b>/patsē/</b><br />
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">A willing actor </span><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace;">who will go down as the sole fall-guy for an event that was actually</span><span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;"> perpetrated, orchestrated and executed by multiple parties. </span><br />
<br />
A patsy is a fall guy for an event. An easy set-up. <br />
<br />
A "participating patsy" is a more evolved attack. Instead of just a set-up, the real attackers actually encourage and utilize a willing and often psychologically unstable "participating patsy". One of the hallmarks of the PP is that the fall-guy is almost always mentally unstable in the eyes of the jury (you the viewing public). <br />
<br />
The PP won't deny that they are the source, brains, and that they acted alone. They think all along that they are going to pull off the attack. They are lured by the power, the ego, and whatever "cause" or "agenda" that they are indoctrinated with. The PP will often take credit for the attack (prior to the attack via video, letters.... or after being captured in the rare event that they weren't murdered by the real attackers) yet all along the attack's success, execution, scope, breadth, and effectiveness was entirely due to the real attackers. They don't have to take credit to be the PP --- if the case is strong against them and they are dead, their mental instability or some back-story can suffice to pitch them as the fall-guy. The PP is a pawn to serve as the fall-guy --- undeniably so since they were apart of the attack all along the way.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.fromthesidebar.com/dogsniff.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.fromthesidebar.com/dogsniff.jpg" height="298" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<b>You can sniff out the PP attack.</b> When the next "event" strikes your local news, <b>PAY ATTENTION</b>. If the initial unfiltered reports and real eye-witnesses acknowledge multiple attackers .... the event is ripe for a PP. If shortly thereafter the "official narrative" emerges and eliminates mentions of the "other" attackers.... the media stations have likely been hand-fed the script via their superiors. The story will read that there was one attacker, not two, or three. All highlighted evidence from this point forward will overwhelmingly show that the lone attacker (or attacker party) was solely responsible for the carnage.<br />
<br />
Consider this pattern for the following events:<br />
<br />
::17 known terrorist attacks ultimately orchestrated by FBI agents but carried out by misguided men that became "terrorists" via the FBI encouragement, resources, and help.<br />
::Sandy Hook (originally multiple shooters reported by multiple sources)<br />
::DC car / barrier event (passenger seen ducking in the video of the fleeing car)<br />
::Retribution Killer (originally reported that the passenger was the shooter, confirms the eye-witness accounts)<br />
::Navy Yard Shooting<br />
<br />
A likely scenario along with these "killings" is that the PP is off'd by the "other" shooter (at the scene). Other-times don't even require the PP present. They could screw up the operation. There are various derivations on this theme --- they all work if the heat all points to the PP. Training videos (on-site) can be used and released as live-event videos to convince the public of the "actual event" even though it didn't go down exactly that way.<br />
<br />
Why orchestrate chaos, murder and mayhem and have a fall-guy? Either the chaos, murder and mayhem is the goal (not likely) or the chaos, murder and mayhem enables reactions/responses that are the goal (much more likely).<br />
<br />
These events and ops take planning.<br />
<br />
It is important to note that none of these attacks actually have to take place in the real world. They can be complete fictions invented and sold to the masses as being "real". The narrative and the fallout from the narrative is what is important. Whether or not this event or that event actually happened (real people died the way the news claims) is irrelevant with respect to what happens NEXT. The agenda is always the end-game. The "response" (or solution purposed and enacted upon us) .... the "reaction" to the "catastrophe"..... is almost always the "reason" behind the "event".<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">You've been warned.</span></b>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-62784131245194842322014-05-27T10:48:00.000-07:002014-05-27T10:51:23.063-07:00A look at a "possible" future:Que up the SCI-FI script:<br />
<div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-uL8o-Q8jt-U/U4TI-rzn2mI/AAAAAAAAAFA/ilvnfgY4kDU/s1600/jobBreakdown.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-uL8o-Q8jt-U/U4TI-rzn2mI/AAAAAAAAAFA/ilvnfgY4kDU/s1600/jobBreakdown.png" height="121" width="400" /></a><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Technology increase is rapidly accelerating and reaching a pace we've never seen. It's hard to grasp how fast things are moving. It is even harder for humans to imagine a word where Artificial Intelligence surpasses that of human intelligence. How can you grasp something that is smarter than you? How can an ant fathom the mind of Einstein? We are on an unstoppable path whereby jobs are minimized and more of the populace becomes unemployed and essentially irrelevant in the eyes of the state.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
As time proceeds more jobs will be <b>automated via new technology advancements</b>. This will increase unemployment because less and less jobs will be available for humans to fill. Social programs will be increasingly put under more and more stress each year. New jobs and skills will pop-up but they will not keep up with those jobs that are lost due to automation and future technologies increasing at exponential rates. The "Minimum Wage" line will move forward into the jobs that currently are considered "skilled" jobs. Why hire a designer when you can employ a program that does a better job in a fraction of the time? Name the job --- it can likely be automated by future technology. The accelerated pace of technology growth will rapidly push the MW line deeper right. MW is always paid for the jobs that require the least skill but cannot yet be automated. MW jobs are always those jobs that are close to being automated and done away with. As more jobs are automated the MW pool will increase by pulling MW+ jobs into MW jobs. There will be less and less jobs left to fill by skilled humans. Many MW+ "skills" in today's world will be considered non-skills in the near future. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
3D printing, autonomous drones, builder-bots, automated tellers, AI personalities, AI experts and AI advisers ---- all are just a sub-set of technologies that are increasingly cutting away from available jobs. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
</div>
<div class="" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<b>Possible Future Scenario:</b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
The majority of America (and humanity) is headed towards a complete welfare state. Eventually there will be a point where the majority of humanity is sustained by the graces of the "state's" welfare programs. Population will have to be minimized. There are no MW jobs in this future. There will be only a few very powerful jobs for humans. The bulk of humanity will be tightly controlled, clothed, housed, fed, and entertained by the state because there is otherwise nothing else for them to do. If you do not subscribe to this future-state program you will have no other way to sustain yourself and your family. </div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-0YkAhvsG9Ac/U4TNhx-Y8GI/AAAAAAAAAFY/SreN_THJmPE/s1600/jobBreakdown2.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-0YkAhvsG9Ac/U4TNhx-Y8GI/AAAAAAAAAFY/SreN_THJmPE/s1600/jobBreakdown2.png" height="41" width="400" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
Less than 1% of 1% will hold the power and be considered "the elite" or the "royalty" in this future. Less than 1% of humanity will be "needed" for the skills they provide the planet. They will be respected by the elite.... the rest of humanity will be the "lowers" --- the lessor species that are kept around only because the powerful elite allow them to live.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-29245988219836938862014-04-11T00:22:00.003-07:002014-05-07T23:07:36.837-07:00False Flags and the next evolution :: FFA vs FFFA As the public's awareness of the age-old "false-flag" tom-foolery increases a new method must be devised.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://thecommonsenseshow.com/siteupload/2013/09/false-flag-pic.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://thecommonsenseshow.com/siteupload/2013/09/false-flag-pic.jpg" height="204" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">The "False-Flag" Attack (FFA):</span></b> Group A pretends to be Group B in order to attack Group C (which could be the same as Group A) in order to justify a response of some kind. The distinction I want to focus on is that <span style="font-size: large;">the response is the <span style="color: #38761d;"><b>desired outcome</b>.</span></span><br />
<br />
The next evolution only becomes possible when the public awareness of the concept of FFA reaches a critical mass.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">The "False False-Flag" Attack (FFFA):</span></b> Group A pretends to be Group B (setting them up) to get caught trying to pull off a false-flag. The important distinction is that<span style="font-size: large;"> the false false-flag attack (FFFA) is the desired attack</span>. It is permitted due to the act being blamed on Group B's failed false-flag attempt. This would essentially allow a particularly crafty and resourceful group to attack any other group, straightaway, with no blow back or repercussions. As compared to the FFA it would require more planning, more diverse resources and a stronger control of the media narrative. It would be akin to the "long con".<br />
<span style="color: red; font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: red; font-size: x-large;">You have been warned.</span>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-61011379126317370022014-03-31T12:37:00.001-07:002014-03-31T13:14:00.971-07:00How to sell a lie :: with the FIIRE method<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">Current % of population believing the truth you are trying to hide: <b><span style="color: red;"> </span><span style="color: lime;"><1%</span></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: red;"><b><br /></b></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><span style="color: red;">Feared </span>percent of population that would know the truth when exposed: <b><span style="color: red;">85%</span></b>. (unacceptable risk!)</span><br />
<br />
<br />
a. <b>Flood</b><br />
Flood the public domain with as many conspiracy theories as possible. Ensure some are over-the-top crazy. Make others more plausible but complete red herrings. In your quest to hide the truth it is a bonus if you can cause some of these theories to tie up the resources of your opponents. If you can successfully flood the market with false data and rabbit holes you will obfuscate the truth among your pile of lies. They have to be believable. Each theory should target a sub-group, demographic or sub-culture of the population. Your goal is to tie them all up with false theories. All you have to do is plant the seeds. The public's imagination will grow the theories, organically, from there. Be proud of watching what your creations become!<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">% of population believing the truth you are trying to hide: <span style="color: lime;"><1<b>%</b></span></span><br />
<br />
b. <b>Inclusion </b><br />
Include the truth you want to hide in the Flood. The general public will lump the truth in with all the <i>other </i>"crazy" conspiracy theories (the ones they don't believe). Focus on making the truth sound like one of the more crazy conspiracy theories. The best way to handle the truth being exposed is to expose it yourself and control the handling and absorption of the information. In the context of "just anther conspiracy theory" most people won't even consider it. They will choose another more plausible theory. Of the very small few who latch on to this "crazy" theory (the actual truth) the overwhelming majority will be duped into switching in the next step.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">% of population believing the truth you are trying to hide: </span><span style="color: lime; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><5-10<b>%</b></span><br />
<br />
c. <b>Invention</b><br />
Manufacture a more believable truth -- a truth that speaks to the general beliefs and expectations of the public. This eventually become the official narrative. When revealed, this will get most the general public to switch from their 'theory' to this 'truth'. You want them thinking, "Aha! So that's what happened!" Most people don't want to believe bad things. They didn't want to believe the conspiracy theory in the "flood" stage. They picked it because it made the most sense to them. If you serve them up a "official narrative" that is even better; they will go out of their way to discredit contradictory facts and evidence if it means keeping their world views together. (cognitive dissonance) The official narrative brings peace to their brains and allows them to set the topic to rest. The lie you are selling here will contain just enough of the elements of the flooded conspiracy theories to allow them to switch with no mental ego hit. They can still say, "see, I knew something <i>like</i> that happened".<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">% of population believing the truth you are trying to hide: </span><span style="color: lime; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><5<b>%</b></span><br />
<br />
d. <b>Repeat and Reinforce</b><br />
Repeat the "truth" you want to sell, in as many forms and formats as possible. Sell, sell, sell. News, blogs, TV shows, movies ---- all of them work together to overtly an covertly influence the minds of the masses. <br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">% of population believing the truth you are trying to hide: </span><span style="color: lime; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><2<b>%</b></span><br />
<span style="color: lime; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span>
e. <b>Experts / Official Agency Sign-off.</b> <br />
Appealing to authority on a mass-scale is an imperative when selling a lie. It becomes harder for the general public to not believe the lie because powerful and educated agencies and groups have backed it. You shown them all the crazy theories, you given them a more believable theory and you reinforced it through as many different 'touch points' as possible. The experts sign-off provide the final support of needed. In today's culture a celebrity and/or athlete is just as relevant as a scientist. It is much easier to believe a lie when someone you "respect" also supports the lie. It is easy to find someone the public respects because their heroes are easily fooled themselves. The best spokesman for a lie is someone who believes that lie.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;">% of population believing the truth you are trying to hide: </span><span style="color: lime; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><1<b>%</b></span><br />
<br />
Congratulations! Using the <b>FIIRE </b>method, you've just sold an invented lie and hid the truth in the pile of flooded babble. You prevented exposure by a "controlled exposure" and forever eliminated the possibility of a breaking news. Your truth is already exposed and the general population never went above a <span style="color: lime;"><b>10% </b></span>belief threshold.<br />
<br />
Anyone who still believes the truth you tried to hide will be ridiculed as abnormal, a conspiracy theorist, and ostracized from being taken seriously. It is impossible to 'buck-the-trend' when the public has been duped (original conspiracy theory) and then re-duped(the official narrative). Once settled on the 'final truth' (the official narrative) they've invested so much time and energy into the process. They will not even allow for that to be challenged again. <br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span>
<b><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">YOU'VE BEEN WARNED</span></b>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-28745256775354148292014-03-26T12:30:00.000-07:002014-03-26T12:32:32.496-07:00Malaysian Flight 370 :: LOGIC TREE<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEikBYXMyGnCfYb874EWmpbnUCz0YrKsG1meTCU8_emZxBn_N2yvZo13T8H_iISiR6e18Ii9muZ45GwzktV5U7T5RC3kCA0g2xk24mMYgEABBdKaALAVELdzUS71RLwZnHyMGeG9oCsNKeOL/s1600/neural_networking.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEikBYXMyGnCfYb874EWmpbnUCz0YrKsG1meTCU8_emZxBn_N2yvZo13T8H_iISiR6e18Ii9muZ45GwzktV5U7T5RC3kCA0g2xk24mMYgEABBdKaALAVELdzUS71RLwZnHyMGeG9oCsNKeOL/s1600/neural_networking.jpg" height="265" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
I. The plane never took off.<br />
<br />
II. The plane took off.<br />
----IIa. The plane landed, intact.<br />
----IIb. The plane crashed.<br />
--------IIb1. The plane crashed on land.<br />
--------IIb2. The plane crashed at sea.<br />
----IIc. The plane never landed (ie. shot down, collided mid-air, blown up, black hole, worm hole etc)Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-90059345950805277262014-03-25T12:20:00.001-07:002014-04-09T11:58:04.962-07:00Ukrainian Timeline<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 15px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>December 15, 2013</b></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 15px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>UKRAINIAN OPPOSITION PRESSES AHEAD WITH MASSIVE RALLY</b></span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 15px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/12/15/ukrainian-oppositionpresseswithmassiverally.html</span></span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 15px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 15px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">"</span></span><span style="background-color: white; color: #888888; font-family: 'Source Sans Pro', sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-style: italic; line-height: 25px;">Around 200,000 people demonstrated against Ukraine joining Soviet-style economic order in lieu of EU trade pact"</span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #888888; font-family: 'Source Sans Pro', sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-style: italic; line-height: 25px;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://america.aljazeera.com/content/ajam/articles/2013/12/15/ukrainian-oppositionpresseswithmassiverally/jcr:content/mainpar/adaptiveimage/src.adapt.960.high.1387139139265.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><img border="0" src="http://america.aljazeera.com/content/ajam/articles/2013/12/15/ukrainian-oppositionpresseswithmassiverally/jcr:content/mainpar/adaptiveimage/src.adapt.960.high.1387139139265.jpg" height="250" width="400" /></span></a></div>
<span style="background-color: white; font-size: x-small; line-height: 15px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white; font-size: x-small; line-height: 15px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white; line-height: 15px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>December 17, 2013</b></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><b>UKRAINE, RUSSIA CUT $15B GAS DEAL</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><u>http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/12/17/russia-restores-oilflowstoukraine.html</u></span><br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><u><br /></u></span>
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://america.aljazeera.com/content/ajam/articles/2013/12/17/russia-restores-oilflowstoukraine/jcr:content/mainpar/adaptiveimage/src.adapt.960.high.1387311376020.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><img border="0" src="http://america.aljazeera.com/content/ajam/articles/2013/12/17/russia-restores-oilflowstoukraine/jcr:content/mainpar/adaptiveimage/src.adapt.960.high.1387311376020.jpg" height="203" width="320" /></span></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><b><br /></b></span>
<b>February 6, 2014</b><br />
<b>Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU</b><br />
<b>(the west is caught red-handed picking the next leader of Ukraine)</b><br />
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/07/us-usa-ukraine-tape-idUSBREA1601G20140207<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span>
<b>February 10, 2014</b><br />
<b>I am Ukrainian - Viral Video</b><br />
Larry Diamond of the US state department produces viral "I am Ukraine" video in an attempt to con the public into backing foreign intervention. This and more is covered by RT in this video:<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/SEcZFgSnVP0?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span>
<b><br /></b><br />
<b>February 18-23, 2014</b><br />
<b>2014 Ukrainian revolution</b><br />
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Ukrainian_revolution<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/72/2014-02-21_11-04_Euromaidan_in_Kiev.jpg/800px-2014-02-21_11-04_Euromaidan_in_Kiev.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><img border="0" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/72/2014-02-21_11-04_Euromaidan_in_Kiev.jpg/800px-2014-02-21_11-04_Euromaidan_in_Kiev.jpg" height="300" width="400" /></span></a></div>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span>
<b style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 15px;">March 5, 2014</b><br />
<b>Leaked Phone Call: Kiev Snipers Hired by US-Backed Opposition</b><br />
http://www.infowars.com/leaked-phone-call-kiev-snipers-hired-by-us-backed-opposition/<br />
<br />
<b style="background-color: white; line-height: 15px;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">March 16, 2014</span></b><br />
<b>Crimea Votes to Secede From Ukraine as Russian Troops Keep Watch</b><br />
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/17/world/europe/crimea-ukraine-secession-vote-referendum.html?_r=0<br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;">April 09, 2014</span></b><br />
<b>ukraine-military-mercenaries-buildup</b><br />
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://rt.com/news/ukraine-military-mercenaries-buildup-013/&strip=1<br />
<i>“We are particularly concerned that the operation involves some 150 American mercenaries from a private company <b>Greystone Ltd</b>., <span style="color: red;"><b>dressed in the uniform of the [Ukrainian] special task police unit Sokol</b></span>,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement. “Organizers and participants of such incitement are assuming a huge responsibility for threatening upon the rights, freedoms and lives of Ukrainian citizens as well as the stability of Ukraine.”</i><br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">You've been warned.</span></b>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-50976191419616948782014-03-25T11:14:00.001-07:002014-03-25T11:14:19.822-07:00UFO Disclosure Possibility Increases<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">
John Podesta was recently appointed into the Obama Cabinet.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://images.politico.com/global/2014/02/05/140205_john_podesta_ap_605.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://images.politico.com/global/2014/02/05/140205_john_podesta_ap_605.jpg" height="216" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
Podesta is a UFO disclosure advocate. This increases the likelihood that this administration will be the one to "disclose" UFO information. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.unexplainable.net/brainbox/uploads/1/Disclosure_1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.unexplainable.net/brainbox/uploads/1/Disclosure_1.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
Whatever is disclosed will be only part truth. What will be disclosed will be used to further control you. The government doesn't purposefully shoot itself in the foot. They will release information for a strategic purpose with a specific plan of action carefully crafted.<br />
<br />
The only thing you can count on with disclosure is the fact that the government found it important enough in this time to announce the disclosure. The content of the disclosure will be enticing to many --- but it needs to be viewed with highly skeptical eyes.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">You've been warned.</span></b>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-3124213461584175072014-03-25T09:39:00.001-07:002014-05-08T19:30:39.914-07:00Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 :: RESPONSE WATCH<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://kkwtan16designcycle.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/investigate.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://kkwtan16designcycle.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/investigate.gif" /></a></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Please read <a href="http://headsupalerts.blogspot.com/2014/03/malaysia-airlines-flight-370.html" target="_blank">malaysia-airlines-flight-370</a> to understand the necessity for this RESPONSE WATCH. By assessing the national RESPONSES to Malaysian flight 370 we can assess the motive and responsible parties behind its disappearance.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red; font-size: large;">3.24.2014</span><br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">Israel closes embassies around the world</span></b><br />
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/23/us-israel-diplomacy-idUSBREA2M0ER20140323<br />
<br />
<span style="color: red; font-size: large;">3.25.2014</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>President Obama: "I’m More Concerned About A Nuke In New York Than Russia"</b></span><br />
http://www.buzzfeed.com/katherinemiller/president-obama-im-more-concerned-about-a-nuke-in-new-york-t<br />
<br />
<span style="color: red; font-size: large;">5.03.2014</span><br />
<h1 style="background-color: white; line-height: 30px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: large; font-weight: normal;">NSA Slits Own Wrist: Classifies MH370 Info – What Do They Know The Rest Of The World Doesn’t Know?</span></h1>
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2014/05/nsa-slits-own-wrist-classifies-mh370-info-what-do-they-know-the-rest-of-the-world-doesnt-know-2462386.html<br />
<br />
<h3 style="background-color: white; font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 1.1em !important; line-height: 21px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">
<strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">In response to a freedom of information request made by Before It’s News friend and Attorney Orly Taitz requesting any and all documents in the possession of NSA regarding the missing Malaysian airplane MH370, the NSA has seemingly slit its own wrist by denying all information under the grounds of Executive Order 13526: “…the MH370 disappearance has been classified as a matter ‘to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign relations’….”</strong></h3>
<div>
<br /></div>
<br />
<span style="color: red; font-size: large;">5.05.2014</span><br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>Disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 Work of Terrorists? 11 Linked to Al Qaeda Probed; Lithium Batteries Part of Cargo Contents?</b></span><br />
http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/551018/20140505/malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370-terrorists-al-qaeda.htm<br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-51095663939103016802014-03-18T15:46:00.001-07:002014-03-25T09:39:48.666-07:00Malaysia Airlines Flight 370<b>Flight 370: Modern Day Mystery</b><br />
<br />
This will not be a story about what "might" have happened. We don't need to conject. It does no good conjecting about "means" and "opportunity" regarding <i>potential </i>crimes of this scale. We don't even know what means were required because we don't know what happened! We don't even have a crime scene yet! Conjecting is a waste of critical thought time and merely an intellectual addiction. There are too many scenarios that are possible. What you will find in this post is information on how to decode these types of events with data that is undeniable and factual ---- by analyzing the real <span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><b>response </b></span>that ensues...... <br />
<br />
The world is watching with their full attention. The consequences of this event will have a future impact that has yet to be seen. That's what I'm encouraging you to watch for. <b><u>Know this: </u></b> <b><span style="font-size: large;">The mystery is not for naught</span></b>. It is working as a means towards a greater goal that we have yet to witness. Great efforts have went into this story, into prepping the public and into captivating a world-wide audience. Do they (who remain unknown) have your attention?<br />
<br />
Our <i>hackles </i>are up. The collective <i>Spidey Senses </i>are tingling. There are many watching this unfold with a deeper sense that something is NOT as it seems. <br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://www.viralblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Malaysia-Plane-1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.viralblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Malaysia-Plane-1.jpg" height="250" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">Note: Even this picture, could be misleading. It programs you, the viewer, with an image of a plane taking off. Is that not a presupposition? Do we know for 100% certainty that Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 ever took off? I think it is a likely assumption. I'm just pointing out how these things work. </span><br />
<br />
<b>Flight 370</b> has the attention of nearly every adult human being on planet earth. In an age of hyper surveillance, lacking privacy, and satellites that can focus on dime laying on the sidewalk of Times Square; we are faced with great modern day mystery. How can a jet simply go missing "without a trace"? Do we really believe our governments don't know what happened? TV shows like <b><i>Lost </i></b>and even the more recent <b><i>Resurrection </i></b>have prepped our minds to consider strange possibilities. We, the general public are infatuated with other-worldly explanations. Everyone has a theory, yet these very theories will only cause you to miss what you are about to be able to see for the first time. The motive is about to be revealed.<br />
<br />
An official answer to the mystery will soon present itself. Let's call this future answer, the "official narrative". The narrative often evolves bit by bit and then finally emerges as a solidified truth in the minds of the viewer. By sheer brute force, volume, and a constant bombardment of imagery and video, you're ready to be sold on a viable answer. Humans like answers. Your brain needs an answer that fits. In a world-wide event with dozens of involved countries ----- selling the narrative takes time. More considerations have to be made and accounted for because there are more moving parts that can contradict. It takes more work to reveal the narrative. We are getting close to that big reveal, but that isn't the real reveal. The real reveal is in the response to the reveal.<br />
<br />
<b><span style="font-size: large;">The nations that take the strongest actions in response to the "official narrative" are the most likely candidates for the owner of the original "motive". Who gains from the action of the response?</span></b><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>When the response is taken the culprit is revealed.</b></span><br />
<br />
It is not by the official story that we will receive the truth. It is by the RESPONSE to the official story that we will receive critical information that will define the motive which will lead us, the uninformed public, to the culprit behind this. If the disappearance is blamed on the Iranians, which leads to a war in Iran --- the likely culprits are those benefiting from a war with Iran. If the plane re-emerges as a weapon and reigns down upon some unsuspecting city the likely culprits are the ones that utilize that event to justify their pre-planned next actions. Play out any of your theories and apply this model of thinking. The means and opportunity are irrelevant right now. The one who benefits from the response is most likely the one behind the original event. They have the motive.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;">This trickery of PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION is not a new pattern. The REACTION will be the public outcry to the "official narrative". The SOLUTION will be the original motive behind causing the problem! </span><br />
<br />
Japan attacks Pearl Harbor -- America outcry -- US enters WWII. Gulf of Tonkin incident -- outcry -- US enters Vietnam War. We tried to use it in Syria with Assad but were derailed with the Kerry gaffe and last-minute save by the Russians. We used it during 9-11.. TOWERS FALL -- outcry -- war in Iraq.. Iraq had nothing to do with the towers falling. The real motive was the desperate imperative to protect the petro-dollar and thus the very foundation of the current US Economy. <br />
<br />
<b>A brief history lesson:</b><br />
All OPEC nations settle their energy transactions in dollars. In return, they get US muscle to defend their trade routes and assets. It is in both our interests to secure this business.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://thehiddentranscript.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/War-in-Iraq.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://thehiddentranscript.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/War-in-Iraq.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
This arrangement has allowed the dollar to reign supreme and gives our nation a free pass to print money with no demand-side ramifications. When Iraq left the petro-dollar in favor of a petro-euro it set a catastrophic precedence. The US had no other viable option but to show the other OPEC nations what happens when you leave the petro-dollar. No one leaves the petro-dollar without facing the wrath of the US military. You could ask Libya's Ghadaffi what happens when you leave the petro-dollar if he wasn't dead. His nation left the petro-dollar for his Gold Dinar and shortly thereafter was invaded, he was killed, and his nation forced back into the petro-dollar cartel. They pulled that off by pitching the world on his "human rights violations". Everything the US economy does is reliant upon support of the dollar via the petro-dollar. The towers falling in 2001 allowed the USA to respond. We responded with war against Iraq. It didn't matter that Iraq had nothing to do with 911. The war allowed the US to respond to the threat and to switch the petro-euro back to the petro-dollar. Our politicians in-the-know can justify the action as a better option to the alternative complete collapse of our nation as we know it. Any war will be chosen over the demise of our economy and a complete collapse of our dollar. <br />
<br />
What's the lesson?<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: large;"><b>It is impossible to cut through the media narrative until you see the national response to the narrative. Only then can you have the information you need to process the event.</b></span><br />
<br />
I'm not suggesting the disappearance of flight 370 is or is not a US hatched plan. I'm suggesting that you pay attention to the RESPONSE that will most assuredly follow the "official narrative" that eventually emerges. <br />
<br />
From the RESPONSE you will be able to determine if this indeed was a horrible accident, a hijacking by terrorists, corporate espionage or a government sponsored attack.<br />
<br />
see an updated RESPONSE WATCH<br />
<a href="http://headsupalerts.blogspot.com/2014/03/malaysia-airlines-flight-370-response.html" target="_blank">Response Watch</a><br />
<br />Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-65310220374386294092013-10-12T02:51:00.001-07:002014-03-19T00:05:57.777-07:00WHY WAR? FOLLOW THE MONEY!<h2>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: small;">
THE US DOLLAR AND WAR - <i style="font-weight: normal;">Follow the Money</i></span></h2>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>1792 </b>- <i>Coinage Act of 1792</i></span><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinage_Act_of_1792" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coinage_Act_of_1792</span></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The Dollar is born!</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> </span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">Section 19 of the Act established <b>a penalty of death for debasing the gold or silver coins authorized by the Act</b>, or embezzlement of the metals for those coins, by officers or employees of the mint; this section of the Act apparently remains in effect and would, in theory, continue to apply in the case of "any of the gold or silver coins which shall be struck or coined at the said mint." (At present the only gold or silver coins struck by the US mint are the American Silver Eagle and the American Gold Eagle coins, some Proof coinage at the San Francisco Mint, such as the silver US State Quarters, and much of the Commemorative coinage of the United States.) All other sections of the act have been superseded, as for example the Coinage Act of 1834 changing the silver-to-gold weight ratio. Various acts have subsequently been passed affecting the amount and type of metal in U. S. coins, so that today there is no legal definition of the term "dollar" to be found in U. S. statute.[4][5][6] Current statutes regulating coinage in the United States may be found in Title 31 of the United States Code.</span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9z9F4ktm4oQ/Ukya4kzWixI/AAAAAAAAACs/oZatzbeEikg/s1600/metaldollar.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9z9F4ktm4oQ/Ukya4kzWixI/AAAAAAAAACs/oZatzbeEikg/s1600/metaldollar.png" /></span></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<b><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">152 years later.... the USA is a global leader and a new world superpower. </span></b><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b>
<b>JULY 22ND, 1944 - </b><i>Bretton Woods Agreement, the US Dollar becomes KING. </i></span><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system</span></a><br />
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">The chief features of the Bretton Woods system were an obligation for each country to adopt a monetary policy that maintained the exchange rate by tying its currency to the U.S. dollar and the ability of the IMF to bridge temporary imbalances of payments.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/GVytOtfPZe8?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />
</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><span style="color: red;">NOTE:</span></b> The agreement once again pegs the value of the U.S. Dollar to a fixed amount of gold. The original dollar was equal to approx 1.6 GRAMS of pure gold. This equated to roughly as $17.72 per ounce of Gold. That price was never supposed to change because the Dollar was merely a measurement of metal. Either 1.6 GRAMS of pure gold, or 24.1 GRAMS of pure silver. Gold at the time of this new agreement is set at $35 per ounce. There are 28.3495 GRAMS in 1 ounce making the "new" Bretton Woods era Dollar redefined as equal to only 0.81 GRAMS of pure Gold. This was at just about half of what it was in the <i><b>Coinage Act of 1792</b></i>. The dollar had officially been devalued by 50%. .</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><span style="color: red;">NOTE: </span></b> The Gold/Silver ratio was initially established at <b>15.0625</b>. With current (Oct 2013) prices of gold and silver that ratio sits at about <b>60</b>. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">THE IMMEDIATE <b>RESULT </b>OF BRETTON WOODS:</span><br />
<b><span style="background-color: white; color: #38761d; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The dollar becomes known as the "</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #38761d; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">world reserve currency</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #38761d; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">". AMERICA holds gold backing our dollar with a promise to pay any nation who wishes to exchange it for $35/ 1 oz.</span></b><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><span style="background-color: white; color: #38761d;"><br /></span></b>
<b><span style="background-color: white; color: #38761d; font-size: large;">Our dollar becomes seen "AS GOOD AS GOLD".</span></b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">With the US Dollar set as the "world currency" (all other fiat currencies were pegged to it as the standard) America gained immense monetary power. All other currencies have a relative value as it compares to the dollar (the standard, which is backed by gold). The USA could literally print money --- and the worldwide demand for it would sustain the value as long as too many of them didn't request the supporting gold all at once. Based on current world-wide estimates (175,000 metric tonnes) and knowing that approx 115,000 metric tonnes have been mined since 1943, at the time of this agreement the entire world supply of gold was 60,000 metric tons, or 1,929,044,796 ounces. At $35/oz, all of the known world gold supplies in 1943 would have had an evaluation of <span style="color: #38761d;"><b>67,516,567,860</b></span> </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>1943</b></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> dollars</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Context of that number: One might wonder how this deal was pulled off considering the US spent over 4 times that in WWII</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> (296B)</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">. <b><span style="color: #990000;"> </span> </b></span><br />
<a href="http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/costs_of_major_us_wars.htm" target="_blank">http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/costs_of_major_us_wars.htm</a><br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<b style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #990000;"><span style="font-size: large;">WWII had cost America 4 times the value of all the gold in the world at $35/oz.</span></span></b><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #990000; font-size: large;"><b><br /></b></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Data on world gold supplies here: </span><a href="http://www.numbersleuth.org/worlds-gold/" target="_blank">http://www.numbersleuth.org/worlds-gold/</a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b></b>
<b>DECEMBER, 27TH 1945</b> - <i>International Monetary Fund (IMF) Established</i></span><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Monetary_Fund" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Monetary_Fund</span></a><br />
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">Officially established on 27 December 1945, when the 29 participating countries at the conference of Bretton Woods signed its Articles of Agreement, the IMF was to be the keeper of the rules and the main instrument of public international management. The Fund commenced its financial operations on 1 March 1947. IMF approval was necessary for any change in exchange rates in excess of 10%. It advised countries on policies affecting the monetary system.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b style="text-align: center;"><br /></b>
<b style="text-align: center;">1960s+</b><i style="text-align: center;"> - Vietnam War Spending Spree </i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">USA continues deeper into their spending spree. When the US needs more money they simply print it or sell loan instruments to raise it. Member nations become concerned about the USA's fiscal health and their ability to backup the Bretton Woods Agreement. Loss of confidence causes member nations to begin exchanging their money for gold (per the agreement) at the agreed upon rate of $35/ounce. They want their gold. Too many nations request gold and America cannot honor the agreement. It would drain their gold supplies because the money supply had already grown beyond our ability to pay it off in gold at $35/ounce.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>1971</b> - <i>Nixon Reneges on the Bretton Woods Deal</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The deal is no longer honored. No more getting gold for $35 USD per ounce. Nixon claims it is the fault of speculators. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/iRzr1QU6K1o?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe><i><br /></i>
</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">All the various "dollar defending" measures done by Nixon in this era were collectively referred to as NIXON SHOCK. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_Shock" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_Shock</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>1972-1973 - </b><i>Growing Concerns Over the Dollar</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Without gold backing, Washington is concerned that global demand for the U.S. "paper" dollar will inevitably subside. The primary justification for making the USD the world reserve currency was no longer honored. Without the peg to Gold no nation had any reason to use, trade or save dollars. Without this extra demand for dollars the the US Government would not be able to get away with printing more dollars without severely hurting the value of the dollar.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<b><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">What will be done?</span></b><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>OCTOBER 1973</b> - <i>YOM KIPPUR WAR (Arab-Israeli War)</i></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/dNvDJbgISqk?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Drives the price of oil up ---</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<b><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">1973 OPEC OIL CRISIS</span></b><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b>
Drives the price of oil further up ---</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/VCLRlVxOH-Q?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Enriching oil producing nations with more money than they know what to do with ----</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;"><b>1973-1974 </b></span></span>- <b><span style="color: red;">SOLUTION</span></b>: The <i>Petro Dollar System Initiated</i></span><br />
<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar</a><br /><span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">A petrodollar is a United States dollar earned by a country through the sale of its petroleum (oil) to another country.[1] The term was coined in 1973 by Georgetown University economics professor, Ibrahim Oweiss, who recognized the need for a term that could describe the dollar received by petroleum exporting countries (OPEC) in exchange for oil.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></span>
<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Saudi Arabia is the first nation to join the system. Also apart of the deal is an agreement that the USA will protect their interests with military might, military bases, and military supplies (provide the muscle). They sell their oil for Dollars (nothing else). They collect the sale proceeds in dollars and spend some of those excess dollar back into investing in US T-Bills and other assets.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Instead of GOLD backing the dollar, essentially <b>OIL </b>now does. The <b><span style="color: #38761d;">Dollar </span></b>has been saved. This again provides global demand for the dollar and gives the US Government a free pass again to print more dollars whenever needed. There is enough demand to support it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><br /></span>
<span style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">Americans standard of living continues to rise.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><b style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;">1975</b> -<i> OPEC Is All In</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">By 1975 the rest of all other OPEC nations took the same deal. They get the protection of the USA as long as they price their products in Dollars and also spend some of those Dollars back into US Treasuries.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">There is tremendous demand for US Dollars even when the USA is printing them at a record pace. All OPEC oil transactions support the demand.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i><br /></i>
</span><br />
<div>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 23.328125px;"><b>SEPTEMBER 24th, 2001</b> -<i> Saddam's Gambit</i></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;"><span style="color: #333333;">Saddam announces he will no longer price his oil for Dollars, he will use Euros. </span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;">AMERICA begins gearing up for war against the PETRO-DOLLAR challenger. No nation can be allowed to set such a precedence against the PETRO-DOLLAR. It is the primary support holding up the global demand for the US Dollar. </span></span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #362f2d; font-weight: bold; line-height: 20px; text-align: justify;">General Wesley Clark. </span></span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 20px; margin-bottom: 14px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="color: #274e13; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>“<span style="font-size: large;">We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran”</span> —</b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/uNvkmCyVMQU?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;">Why those nations? Is it coincidence?</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 23.328125px;"><b>MARCH 20TH, 2003</b> - <i>USA Response To Saddam's Petro-Euro gambit.</i></span></div>
<div>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 23.328125px;">Iraq is invaded by the USA and after Saddam is overthrown (and executed) their new Petro-Euro system is soon-after reverted back to Petro-Dollars. Dollar crisis averted and a strong lesson is sent to all other OPEC nations. Message Sent: No one will be permitted to leave the Petro-Dollar.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;"><b>2005 </b>- </span></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;">Iran announces </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;">it will form its own International Oil Bourse (IOB) and deal its oil in primarily the </span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;">euro and the Iranian rial.</span></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;">AMERICA begins gearing up for war against the next PETRO-DOLLAR challenger. This won't happen overnight, even Wesley said it would be the last on the list.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;">WORLD DOESN'T BUY-OFF ON ATTACKING IRAN</span></span><br />
<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/1108/Imminent-Iran-nuclear-threat-A-timeline-of-warnings-since-1979/Dialing-back-the-estimate-2006-09"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/1108/Imminent-Iran-nuclear-threat-A-timeline-of-warnings-since-1979/Dialing-back-the-estimate-2006-09</span></a><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; line-height: 22px;"><b>2005</b>: US presents 1,000 pages of designs and other documentation allegedly retrieved from a computer laptop in Iran the previous year, which are said to detail high-explosives testing and a nuclear-capable missile warhead. The “alleged studies,” as they have since been called, are dismissed by Iran as forgeries by hostile intelligence services.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; line-height: 22px;"><br /></span>
</span><br />
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; line-height: 22px; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>2006</b>: The drums of war beat faster after the New Yorker’s Seymour Hersh quotes US sources saying that a strike on Iran is all but inevitable, and that there are plans to use tactical nuclear weapons against buried Iranian facilities.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>JULY 11th, 2006</b> - <i>Syria moves away from the Dollar. </i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">We have another petro-dollar challenger! </span><a href="http://www.gata.org/node/4252" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.gata.org/node/4252</span></a></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; line-height: 22px; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>2007</b>: President Bush warns that a nuclear-armed Iran could lead to "World War III." Vice President Dick Cheney had previously warned of "serious consequences" if Iran did not give up its nuclear program.</span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; color: #333333; line-height: 22px; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>2007</b>: A month later, an unclassified National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iran is released, which controversially judges with "high confidence" that Iran had given up its nuclear weapons effort in fall 2003.</span></div>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 23.328125px;"><b>FEBRUARY 17TH, 2008</b> - Iran's IOB opens.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 20px;"><b>2009 </b>- <i>GHADAFI proposes the GOLD backed Dinar. </i> </span><br />
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 20px;">Another petro-dollar challenger! We now have IRAN, SYRIA and LIBYA. This is getting very dangerous for the old dollar.</span><br />
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 20px;"> </span></span><a href="http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/02/libyas-gold-dinar-oil-for-gold-killed.html" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" target="_blank">http://havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.com/2013/02/libyas-gold-dinar-oil-for-gold-killed.html</a><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;"><b>MARCH 19TH, 2011</b> </span><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;">- <i>GHADAFI killed, Libya invaded by NATO</i></span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 23.328125px;">No More Gold Dinar. Petro-dollar crisis averted! </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;">Message Sent: No one will be permitted to leave the Petro-Dollar.</span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"> We have total control of the media and what the world will believe. We will prove you to be a violator of human rights if that is what it takes to justify our actions.</span></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/mm2teVDX8-c?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; line-height: 22px;"><b>NOVEMBER 2011</b> - <i>IRAN, part Deux --- public opinion must be swayed.</i></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; line-height: 22px;">The IAEA now claims</span><span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; line-height: 22px;"> that Iran is has worked on weapons-related activities for years. They publish detailed information based on 1,000+ pages of design information that is corroborated, it claims, by data from 10 member states and its own investigation and interviews.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><b>AUGUST 11,20 2012</b> - <i>SYRIA RED LINE setup</i></span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 22px;">US (on atleast 2 occasions via Clinton and Obama) declares that use of chemical weapons by Syria is a red line.</span></span><br />
<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/policy-and-strategy/297745-a-timeline-on-syria-from-the-uprising-to-obamas-red-line" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/policy-and-strategy/297745-a-timeline-on-syria-from-the-uprising-to-obamas-red-line</span></a><br />
<div style="background-color: white; border: 0px; line-height: 21px; margin: 15px 1px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.5 !important; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">• Aug. 11, 2012:</b> Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says in Istanbul that it’s clear to the Assad regime the use of chemical weapons is “a red line for the world.”</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b style="border: 0px; line-height: 1.5 !important; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">• Aug. 20, 2012:</b><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 21px;"> </span><span style="background-color: white; line-height: 21px;">Obama says for the first time that the use or movement of chemical weapons by the Assad regime is a red line. "We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized," Obama said at a press conference. "That would change my calculus. That would change my equation."</span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;">.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><b>Side Jaunt: </b> </span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 22px;">Meanwhile, the USA continues to fund and support the rebellion in Syria (which opposes the Assad's government). These weapons don't just get used in the Syria conflict once the various rebel groups get them.</span></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/ttp9X1-ZU5c?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/2OeDd667EUI?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333; line-height: 22px;">Led by the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Queda joins in on the fight and we fund and train them along with the other rebels. </span></span><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood_of_Syria" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood_of_Syria</span></a><br />
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 19.1875px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: x-small;">In 2012, Brotherhood activists created the Commission for Civilian Protection (CCP). The CCP is considered to be a front for the Brotherhood,<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-32" style="line-height: 1em; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood_of_Syria#cite_note-32" style="background-image: none; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none; white-space: nowrap;">[32]</a></sup> tasked with helping armed units inside Syria connect with each other and with sponsors abroad. Its website lists numerous affiliated factions, distributed across Homs, Damascus, Idlib, and elsewhere; however, most of these groups are small and generally self-identify as members of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Syrian_Army" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none;" title="Free Syrian Army">Free Syrian Army</a> or the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Islamic_Liberation_Front" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none;" title="Syrian Islamic Liberation Front">Syrian Islamic Liberation Front</a>.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-33" style="line-height: 1em; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood_of_Syria#cite_note-33" style="background-image: none; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none; white-space: nowrap;">[33]</a></sup> The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood is believed to control, through funding, one-fourth to one-third of the disparate armed rebel brigades known collectively as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Syrian_Army" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none;" title="Free Syrian Army">Free Syrian Army</a> (FSA).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-fnvw.org_13-1" style="line-height: 1em; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood_of_Syria#cite_note-fnvw.org-13" style="background-image: none; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none; white-space: nowrap;">[13]</a></sup></span></div>
<div style="background-color: white; line-height: 19.1875px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-top: 0.4em;">
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: x-small;">At the same time Brotherhood leaders have been reaching out to reassure leaders in neighboring <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none;" title="Jordan">Jordan</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none;" title="Iraq">Iraq</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebanon" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none;" title="Lebanon">Lebanon</a> — as well as the West – that they "have no intention of dominating a future Syrian political system"<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-wp05122012_3-3" style="line-height: 1em; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood_of_Syria#cite_note-wp05122012-3" style="background-image: none; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none; white-space: nowrap;">[3]</a></sup> and have "played down" their "growing influence" in the Syrian opposition.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-reuters_2-3" style="line-height: 1em; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood_of_Syria#cite_note-reuters-2" style="background-image: none; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none; white-space: nowrap;">[2]</a></sup> The Syrian MB has assured outsiders that it is "going to great lengths to ensure" that its donated weapons "don’t fall into the hands of extremists".<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-wp05122012_3-4" style="line-height: 1em; unicode-bidi: -webkit-isolate;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood_of_Syria#cite_note-wp05122012-3" style="background-image: none; color: #0b0080; text-decoration: none; white-space: nowrap;">[3]</a></sup></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/0r0_Uxk7EyQ/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://youtube.googleapis.com/v/0r0_Uxk7EyQ&source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed width="320" height="266" src="http://youtube.googleapis.com/v/0r0_Uxk7EyQ&source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><b>AUGUST 21ST, 2013</b> - <i>Alleged Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria.</i></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><b>AUGUST 31ST, 2013</b> -<i> Obama blames Assad and gears up for war.</i></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Obama:</span><br />
<span style="line-height: 18px;"><span style="color: #38761d; font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;">after careful deliberation, I have decided that the United States should take military action against Syrian regime targets</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;">He also says, </span></span></span><br />
<span style="line-height: 18px;"><span style="color: #38761d; font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><span style="font-size: large;"> I've long believed that our power is rooted not just in our military might, but in our example as a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. And that’s why I've made a second decision: I will seek authorization for the use of force from the American people's representatives in Congress.</span> </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;">Note, the first decision was to attack Syria. The second decision was in addition to the first. </span></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 22px;">He makes sure to remind us that the congressional vote won't stop him from going to war. If you listened you would already know this because his first decision was to attack. His second decision was to get congressional approval for the decision. Obama was going to war with Syria .....</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #38761d; font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: large;"><span style="line-height: 18px;">Yet, while I believe I have the authority to carry out this military action without specific congressional authorization, I know that the country will be stronger if we take this course, and our actions will be even more effective. We should have this debate, because the issues are too big for business as usual. </span><span style="line-height: 22px;">:</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
<object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/_r_AAQYbNVs/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://youtube.googleapis.com/v/_r_AAQYbNVs&source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed width="320" height="266" src="http://youtube.googleapis.com/v/_r_AAQYbNVs&source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>SEPTEMBER 8TH, 2013 </b>- <i>USA RELEASES THEIR "VIDEO PROOF".</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The video didn't "prove" who did the attack. No major nations denied the attack happened but the evidence on "who" did the attack was very foggy at this point. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>WAR WITH SYRIA IMMINENT</b> ........ until the unforeseen happens:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 22px;"><b>SEPTEMBER 9TH, 2013 - </b><i>KERRY's SYRIA GAFFE AND RAPID RUSSIAN DIPLOMACY POUNCING ON GAFFE FORCES USA to PAUSE ITS PLANS.</i></span></span><br />
<a href="http://pri.org/stories/2013-09-09/kerry-comments-lead-russian-peace-proposal-syria" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://pri.org/stories/2013-09-09/kerry-comments-lead-russian-peace-proposal-syria</span></a><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/ArAWHxTVcC4?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>SEPTEMBER 10TH, 2013</b> - <i>ASSAD AGREES TO TURN OVER ALL CHEMICAL WEAPONS</i></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">In an effort to stop the USA from attacking Syria Assad agrees to turn over all chemical weapons for immediate destruction.</span></div>
<div>
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/10/syrian-official-says-country-accepts-proposal-to-turn-over-chemical-weapons/" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/10/syrian-official-says-country-accepts-proposal-to-turn-over-chemical-weapons/</span></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>SEPTEMBER 18TH, 2013</b> - <i>ASSAD INTERVIEW.</i></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 22px;">All along Assad denied responsibility. He granted an interview with Kucinich and Greg Palkot on (September 18th), Assad discloses that he invited the UN inspectors to his country the very week the attack would later happen. He claims it was the rebels who were behind the attack. He also brings up other reasons why he was not behind the alleged chemical attack.</span></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/qmMmGZQaVsc?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 22px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: large; line-height: 23.328125px;"><b>So what just happened?</b></span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;"><b><br /></b></span></span>
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;">Quick recap:</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;">America draws a red line on Syria to define when they will be able to justify their planned war. The red line is allegedly crossed. Obama declares 2 decisions, 1) he will go to war and 2) at vote in which he hopes congress will back him. The USA's near certain entrance into the Syrian war is thwarted</span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"> by a last-second Kerry gaffe, pounced on by Russian diplomacy, and followed through with by Assad.</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;">The USA loses their excuse to go to war with Syria. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span>
</span><br />
<div data-key="ibtwr" data-num="2" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; margin-bottom: 18px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="background-color: transparent;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 23.328125px;">Senator Lindsey Graham lays down another possible way America can get into the Syrian conflict:</span></span></span><br />
<a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/09/08/lindsey-graham-implies-failure-to-strike-syria-may-result-in-u-s-getting-nuked/" style="background-color: transparent; color: #333333; line-height: 22px;" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/09/08/lindsey-graham-implies-failure-to-strike-syria-may-result-in-u-s-getting-nuked/</span></a></div>
<div data-key="ibtwr" data-num="2" style="background-color: white; border: 0px; color: #333333; line-height: 22px; margin-bottom: 18px; padding: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">“I believe that if we get Syria wrong, within six months – and you can quote me on this – there will be a war between Iran and Israel over their nuclear program,” Graham told a gathering of supporters in South Carolina Wednesday, <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/09/05/grahams-hawkish-posture-confronts-war-weary-voters-in-south-carolina" style="border: 0px; color: #e91e24; margin: 0px; outline: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">according to U.S. News and World Report</a>. </span><span style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace;">“It won’t come to America on top of a missile, it’ll come in the belly of a ship in the Charleston or New York harbor,” he added.</span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><span style="color: red;">UPDATE: </span> </b>Another high-level officer in charge of US nukes is forced out / let go.</span><br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/apnewsbreak-air-force-firing-general-in-charge-of-nuclear-missile-force-citing-loss-of-trust/2013/10/11/ac728cde-3286-11e3-ad00-ec4c6b31cbed_story.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/apnewsbreak-air-force-firing-general-in-charge-of-nuclear-missile-force-citing-loss-of-trust/2013/10/11/ac728cde-3286-11e3-ad00-ec4c6b31cbed_story.html</span></a><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">>>> </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><a href="http://www.infowars.com/" target="_blank">Infowars.com</a></b> first reported that a nuke went missing and was shipped by truck to Linsey Graham's home state. </span><br />
<a href="http://www.infowars.com/top-nuke-commanders-fired-following-missing-nuclear-warheads-report/" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.infowars.com/top-nuke-commanders-fired-following-missing-nuclear-warheads-report/</span></a><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">How are these events related? You have all the information you need. It is all in the public domain. US needs to go to war in Syria to preserve the petro-dollar and the american economy and financial system. Top level officials/generals in charge of nukes are being fired / let go at the same time of a sitting US Senator warning of nuclear attack on US soil ..... We simultaneously have reports of missing nuke(s) being transferred off the books to the very location the Senator warned about. (his home state) </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 23.328125px;"><b>Conclusion:</b></span><br />
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 23.328125px;">You know the target country list. You know the REAL REASONS WHY.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;">There are other world players that have a say in this. The US has been losing its global control. Russia is growing strong again. China is becoming a super power. The game is out in the open. The world's power players see the great American weakness, the Petro-Dollar. Google it. Read about it. It isn't a secret. Everyone knows the petro-dollar is the only thing holding up the US economic house of cards. America has exploited our allies and enemies economically </span></span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"> </span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;">through the use of the dollar</span><span style="color: #333333; line-height: 23.328125px;"> </span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;">as far back as the Bretton Woods agreement. America knows its only economic hope is to maintain the petro-dollar. SYRIA could be the fulcrum of the Petro-Dollar's fate. If so, the US will find a way to get to war. For all the years the US has siphoned money from the world, for all its meddling in other nation's politics with the sole intent of preserving the dollar and the American way of life................ will America one day be on the other side of that exchange? Are we headed there now? What are our leaders willing to do in order to sell us and/or the world a war with Syria? </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<div>
<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 23.328125px;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Some further documentation:</span><br />
<a href="http://osnetdaily.com/2013/09/syria-war-is-it-about-the-last-gasp-for-the-petrodollar/" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://osnetdaily.com/2013/09/syria-war-is-it-about-the-last-gasp-for-the-petrodollar/</span></a><br />
<a href="http://www.caseyresearch.com/cdd/egypt-the-petrodollars-latest-battleground" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.caseyresearch.com/cdd/egypt-the-petrodollars-latest-battleground</span></a><br />
<a href="http://www.egyptoil-gas.com/read_article_issues.php?AID=74" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">http://www.egyptoil-gas.com/read_article_issues.php?AID=74</span></a><br />
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large;"><br /></span></div>
<span style="color: red; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-large; line-height: 23.328125px;"><b>You've been warned.</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">FOOTNOTE:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><br />
<span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;">In 1792 $1 dollar was defined as 1.6 grams of gold. 1 oz of gold was $17.50.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="line-height: 23.328125px;">By </span></span>1944 the original $1 dollar was redefined as .81 grams of gold. 1 oz of gold was $35.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">By 2013, $1 could only buy you 0.022 grams of gold. 1 oz of gold cost $1300.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><br />
The dollar has retained only 1.375% of its initial value. In 221 years the dollar has lost 98.625% of its value, as compared to gold. It is heading toward a 0 value and its final resting place ---- the last gasp of which is ALWAYS hyper-inflation. The currency becomes utterly worthless. It holds no value and all confidence is lost in it.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><br />
There are quite a few examples of this happening.. A recent example....Zimbabwe:</span><br />
<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21576665-grubby-greenbacks-dear-credit-full-shops-and-empty-factories-dollars-they" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21576665-grubby-greenbacks-dear-credit-full-shops-and-empty-factories-dollars-they</span></a><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;"><br />
Things got so bad that they printed 100 TRILLION dollar notes (100,000,000,000,000) after they experienced an inflation rate of <span style="line-height: 23px;">231,000,000% in the summer of 2008. Shortly thereafter the currency died and was completely abandoned.</span></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="line-height: 23px;"><br /></span></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2133871860779168712.post-81643984392539746202013-10-02T11:54:00.002-07:002014-03-18T19:47:10.838-07:00Programming Acceptance of What Is To Come<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>See a Pattern?</b></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b><br /></b></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>SEPTEMBER 11TH, 2001 - </b></span><i style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Operation Northern Vigilance, </i><i style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Global Guardian, Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior (?) training drills.</i><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_operations_and_exercises_on_September_11,_2001">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_operations_and_exercises_on_September_11,_2001</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>SEPTEMBER 11TH, 2001</b> - <i>9-11 Tragedy</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><i><br /></i></span>
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>SEPTEMBER 12TH, 2001</b> - <i>planned FEMA drill in NYC at pier 92. (cancelled due to 9-11, but personnel and equipment used in rescue/relief/response cmd center.</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Quote by Rudy Giuliani:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">"... the reason Pier 92 was selected as a command center was because on the next day, on September 12, Pier 92 was going to have a drill, it had hundreds of people here, from FEMA, from the Federal Government, from the State, from the State Emergency Management Office, and they were getting ready for a drill for biochemical attack. So that was gonna be the place they were going to have the drill. The equipment was already there, so we were able to establish a command center there, within three days, that was two and a half to three times bigger than the command center that we had lost at 7 World Trade Center. And it was from there that the rest of the search and rescue effort was completed."</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>JULY 7TH, 2005</b> - <i>London Tube Bombing Drill</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>JULY 7TH, 2005</b> - <i>London Tube Bombing</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">On the day of the bombings Peter Power of Visor Consultants gave interviews on BBC Radio 5 Live and ITV saying that he was working on a crisis management simulation drill, in the City of London, "based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning", when he heard that an attack was going on in real life. He described this as a coincidence. He also gave an interview to the Manchester Evening News where he spoke of "an exercise involving mock broadcasts when it happened for real".[37] After a few days he dismissed it as a "spooky coincidence" on Canadian TV.[38]</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>DECEMBER 14TH, 2012,</b> 9am-4pm, Bridgeport, Connecticut - <i>FEMA drill: Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters.</i> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="http://www.ct.gov/demhs/ical/eventDetail_page.asp?date_ID=CAC9C6C9CF83CDC9C9">http://www.ct.gov/demhs/ical/eventDetail_page.asp?date_ID=CAC9C6C9CF83CDC9C9</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>DECEMBER 14TH, 2012</b>, 9:35am, Newtown, Connecticut - <i>Sandy Hook Tragedy</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_Elementary_School_shooting</a></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>EARLY 2013</b> - Boston, MA - <i>Operation Urban Shield</i> </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Training drills are set up to mimic urban bombs in backpacks being planted at public events. </span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="https://www.urbanshield.org/" target="_blank">https://www.urbanshield.org/</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>APRIL 15TH, 2013</b> - Boston, MA - <i>Boston Marathon Bombing</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">An actual bombing takes place that matches the precise parameters that Operation Urban Shield was planning against. Witnesses on the ground claim a bomb training announcement was blasted over a loud speaker. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br />Ali Stevenson told local 15 News, </span><span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">“They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Later, DHS admits to the drills:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=25582" target="_blank">http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=25582</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">The Department of Homeland Security has gone public with an admission that an exercise was planned months before the Boston Marathon bombings that involved backpacks being used to detonate explosives by rogue terrorists. According to the DHS documents acquired by the Boston Globe, the agents were planning on conducting training exercises centered around a fictitious terrorist group called ‘Free America Citizens’, a group that would plant backpacks full of explosives around Boston that the detectives would be forced to track down. Ultimately, of course, this ended up happening at the Boston Marathon itself with precise accuracy. The Globe report reads that “the city was hit with a real terrorist attack executed in a frighteningly similar fashion.” And the DHS isn’t denying that the training exercise manifested itself at the Boston Marathon, as detailed in the back-end article on the Boston Globe that I discovered while browsing the news. “The real thing happened before we were able to execute,” a Boston police official told the Boston Globe in the report.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>SEPTEMBER 5TH, 2013</b> - "<i>A nuclear threat revealed</i>.</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">“</span><br />
<a href="http://charlotte.cbslocal.com/2013/09/03/graham-nukes-in-hands-of-terrorists-could-result-in-bomb-coming-to-charleston-harbor/" target="_blank">http://charlotte.cbslocal.com/2013/09/03/graham-nukes-in-hands-of-terrorists-could-result-in-bomb-coming-to-charleston-harbor/</a><br />
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">I believe that if we get Syria wrong, within six months – and you can quote me on this – there will be a war between Iran and Israel over their nuclear program,”</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> Graham told a gathering of supporters in South Carolina Wednesday, according to U.S. News and World Report</span><span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: x-small;">.</span><span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">“It won’t come to America on top of a missile, it’ll come in the belly of a ship in the Charleston or New York harbor</span><span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; font-size: x-small;">,”</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> he added.</span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<b style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">OCTOBER 1ST, 2013</b><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> - </span><i style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">GOVT Shuts down.</i><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><b>OCTOBER 2ND, 2013</b> - <i>Programming Acceptance of What Is To Come.</i></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57605670/intel-chief-shutdown-threatens-national-security/" target="_blank">http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57605670/intel-chief-shutdown-threatens-national-security/</a></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">In a recent news release Director of National Intelligence James Clapper claims we are at risk of being attacked since the Govt. is shut down.</span><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: red; font-size: x-large;"><b>UPDATE:</b></span><br />
<b>SEPTEMBER 30TH - OCTOBER 3RD</b>, Washington DC -<i> Capitol Shield Training Drill (joint-op)</i><br />
<a href="http://www.army.mil/article/112574/" target="_blank">http://www.army.mil/article/112574/</a><br />
<span style="background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #3d3d3d; font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; line-height: 16.796875px;">WASHINGTON (Oct. 1, 2013) -- First responders in the National Capital Region need to keep their skills at a high level of proficiency. Participating in Capital Shield 14 is one of the methods they used to maintain their expertise.</span><br />
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><br style="background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #3d3d3d; line-height: 16.796875px;" /></span>
<span style="background-color: #f7f7f7; color: #3d3d3d; font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace; line-height: 16.796875px;">Capital Shield 2014 is a joint training exercise in the National Capital Region, or NCR, that runs from Sept. 30 thru Oct. 3, and is hosted by the Joint Force Headquarters - National Capital Region. It brings federal, state, local and municipal agencies together to realistically test interagency operability during a crisis impacting the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland. It also trains and prepares the Department of Defense to provide defense support to civil authorities and employ appropriate force protection measures as requested.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>OCTOBER 3RD </b>- Washington DC - <i>Driver killed after car chase from White House to Capitol</i><br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/police-lock-down-capitol-after-shots-fired/2013/10/03/48459e0e-2c5a-11e3-8ade-a1f23cda135e_story.html" target="_blank">http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/police-lock-down-capitol-after-shots-fired/2013/10/03/48459e0e-2c5a-11e3-8ade-a1f23cda135e_story.html</a><br />
<br />
<b>OCTOBER 3RD</b> - Washington DC - COP CAR SMASHES INTO BARRIER<br />
Note: This is what smashing / ramming into a barrier looks like. This happened the same day as the training drill and the report / scenario with Miriam Carey.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<iframe allowfullscreen='allowfullscreen' webkitallowfullscreen='webkitallowfullscreen' mozallowfullscreen='mozallowfullscreen' width='320' height='266' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/plqofa7ZqAw?feature=player_embedded' frameborder='0'></iframe></div>
<br />
<h2>
<span style="color: red;"><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">You've been warned.</span></span></h2>
<br />
<h2>
</h2>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08919754662898962689noreply@blogger.com0